Will Joe Andrew’s Audacity trump Jeremiah Wright’s hold on the pundits attention?
Joe Andrew seemingly had every reason in the world to support Hillary Clinton’s bid for the Democratic nomination. Tapped by President Bill Clinton to replace Steven Grossman as the chair of the Democratic National Committee starting in 1999, Andrew had come out in support of Senator Clinton’s run for the White House the very day she announced her candidacy.
It takes a brave soul to change a publicly stated position, which is why politicians are routinely so cagey and circumspect in answering questions. Today, in announcing that he is switching his support for that nomination to Senator Barack Obama, Joe Andrew made an impassioned plea in an open letter to other Super Delegates. Having heard tales of the pressures applied to Super Delegates, one can only marvel at Andrew’s candor and courage.
“I ask Hoosiers to come together and vote for Barack Obama to be our next President. In an accident of timing, Indiana has been given the opportunity to truly make a difference. Hoosiers should grab that power and do what in their heart they know is right. They should reject the old negative politics and vote for true change. Don’t settle for the tried and true and the simplistic slogans, but listen to your heart and dare to be inspired. Only a cynic would be critical of Barack Obama inspiring millions. Only the uninformed could forget that the candidate that wins in November is always the candidate that inspires millions.
I ask the leaders of our Party to come together after this Tuesday’s primary to heal wounds and unite us around a single nominee. While I was hopeful that a long, contested primary season would invigorate our Party, the polls show that the tone and temperature of the race is now hurting us. John McCain, without doing much of anything, is now competitive against both of our remaining candidates. We are doing his work for him and distracting Americans from the issues that really affect all of our lives.”
The media has been chasing ratings during the approach to the Indiana and North Carolina primaries on May 6, playing up the connection between Barack Obama and the increasingly bombastic Reverend Jermiah Wright (notorious for the storm over taking
his “America’s chickens are coming home to roost” statement out of context.) Voters in these two states deserve better coverage of the issues of concern in the present - energy dependencies, home mortgage scams that threaten the entire U.S. economy, and the fact the Mission Accomplished announcement five years ago today was evidently the harbinger of this generation’s Viet Nam. It will be fascinating, and probably troubling, to see if they cover this story or stick to Jeremiah Wright, who needs their help to boost sales of his forthcoming book. I find Joe Andrew’s thoughts and decision far more compelling, frankly.
“We need a candidate who will re-invigorate the economy and keep good jobs here in America. We need a candidate who will end the war in Iraq. We need a candidate who will provide health coverage for our 45 million uninsured neighbors. We need a candidate who will end our addiction to high-priced foreign oil by investing in renewable energy here at home.
That candidate is Barack Obama.”
We understand why members of the opposing political party are gleeful, they prefer a story impugning Obama’s judgment or character to focusing attention on their own. What’s more important, do you suppose, the issues confronting our country, or providing more limelight to an author? Oh for the days when “follow the money” didn’t mean a news organization was pandering for ratings but actually investigating a real story.
“Many Democrats know me for one short speech I gave over and over again in the 2000 Presidential campaign. That speech was about welcoming people into our Party and welcoming undecided voters to our campaign to elect Al Gore. Today, we need to welcome Clinton supporters, undecided voters, and all Americans to join Barack Obama’s cause to fight for a better America. My speech ended with these words, which are even more relevant today:
The difference between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party is that you are always welcome in the Democratic Party.
Because Democrats don’t care if you are black or white or brown or a nice shade of green, you are welcome in the Democratic Party.
We don’t care if you pray in a church or a synagogue or a temple or a mosque, or just before math tests, you are welcome in the Democratic Party.
We don’t care if you are young or old, or just don’t want to tell your age, you are welcome in the Democratic Party.
We don’t care what gender you are, or what gender you want to hold hands with; as long as you want to hold hands, you are welcome in the Democratic Party.
We don’t care about the size of your bank account, just the size of your heart; and we don’t care where you are today, just where you dream you want to be tomorrow.
That is your Democratic Party.
That is Barack Obama’s Democratic Party.”
Filed under: 2008 Election, Democratic nomination, Media coverage, Obama, politics, presidential campaign, super delegate | Tagged: 2008 Election, America's chickens, Barack Hussein Obama, coming home to roost, Democratic nomination, follow the money, Indiana Primary, Jeremiah Wright, Joe Andrew, Mission Accomplished, North Carolina primary, superdelegate
Barack Obama’s Democratic Party, whatever he may have said about it, is becoming one that does not want me in it. I don’t care much about the Rev. Wright. I care about policies, and was certainly prepared to have those debated in a reasonable fashion. But I don’t feel included in Obama’s party. I respect your difference of opinion, and maybe I am one of those cynics, but I am not inspired by Obama in the least. And when I tried to talk to the DNC about an issue, as soon as they found out I was a Hillary supporter, the person hung up on me. I called back, same thing. So much for non-divisiveness and civility, etc.
I think that’s part of the point, with the so-called news media pandering for ratings, real issues are being marginalized or ignored.
Obama’s positions are well documented here: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/ and his plans are well-articulated here: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf
Can’t argue for or justify the DNC actions you report, although I’ll note that they are largely a product of Clinton personnel choices.
Yeah, I supported Howard Dean too, so I helped make my own bed. I thought he’d fight back against Republicans and I was tired of a weak DNC. I don’t understand what he is doing now.
I have read Obama’s positions, but I appreciate the links. I have read his books. He just doesn’t win me over. It’s not a big deal ordinarily–I have voted for Democrats who have underwhelmed me. I get put off by the arrogant tone (not accusing you of this) that I am less than smart if I don’t adore Obama.
Well, hunt, I think you’re encountering a very normal spin - I’ve been following elections for decades, and whenever I disagree with somebody else’s candidate preference they seem to imply that I “just don’t get it” - that if I was paying more attention, or maybe just a little smarter, I’d see it the right way.
That’s a fairly normal human reaction: we all do what we believe is best, and smartest. We invest, in a sense, in our positions even though it’s often not in the financial sense… but people tie themselves to the candidates. I’ve had supporters of another candidate (in a previous election cycle) literally rip a campaign button off my jacket and stomp on it. That didn’t change my political opinion, but it surely lowered my estimate of the open-mindedness of that particular supporter.
Personally, I’m delighted to see the electorate so fired up, I just wish there was such a thing as objective reporting. Even PBS seems unable to avoid injecting spin lately, and if that last bastion of journalistic integrity has crumbled it’s no wonder that we have CNN, a network that was built on sensational war reporting, covering Wright’s grandstanding.
I also like it that the electorate is fired up. I like that tons of people seem want to vote, rather than feeling it’s a useless exercise. At the same time, I have never felt so exasperated with my party. I hear it from Obama’s side too–everyone feels that they are being hard done by, in the media, from the DNC. I don’t know whose pin you were wearing, but that is a pretty hot reaction. Of course, my partner was afraid to put a Gore poster in our yard because we live in a Republican neighborhood. I could never figure out why people hate Gore, but there are some.
I don’t usually feel like someone who disagrees with me is stupid or crazy if they present their ideas in a reasoned way. I don’t feel like I know what’s best for everyone. In this election, I have been lectured at more than ever. Maybe just my circumstances.