Once Senator John McCain and the RNC began circumventing the McCain/Feingold limits via the creation of the “McCain Victory ‘08 Fund” with its $70,000 per individual donations 
they really left presumptive Democratic nominee Senator Barack Obama with no reason to keep extending his offer to limit campaign spending by accepting public financing. They sprang into faux outrage, of course, ready to accuse him of a flip-flop despite the fact they’d not accepted Obama’s conditional offer. Follow the money, not the spin, and you discover that this has gone virtually unreported. The commercial media outlets have a conflict of interest; reporting on the McCain fund undermines their profits.
Here’s the simple truth:
The more money McCain (or Obama) has to spend, the more the media stands to earn on selling commercials. Selling not only to the two campaigns, but to PACs and 527s and anybody else who will buy air-time. The media clearly have a vested interest in not just ratings, but more so in the demand for commercials, and so the closer the race – and the more money the candidates (or parties, or 527s, etc.) raise – the more money the media outlets make by selling. Why report on the RNC’s funding success as they skirt the intent of McCain~Feingold on McCain’s behalf? Much better business to take advantage of all that cash, not cut off the former campaign reformer now laying golden eggs. It’s their bottom line at stake, same as it ever was.
Talk about a conflict of interest.Was it big oil money pouring in, as the sudden change in McCain’s stand on drilling in environmentally sensitive areas suggests? How will we ever know? There’s no benefit to a commercial news outlet in uncovering the source of the money – they are just trying to get their piece of it.
Filed under: 2008 Election, Media coverage, Obama, campaign finance, politics, presidential campaign | Tagged: $2300 limit, $70, 000 donation, 527, advertising, Barack Hussein Obama, Campaign finance reform, campaign spending limits, circumventing FEC, conflict of interest, follow the money, John McCain, McCain Feingold, McCain Victory '08 Fund, Media coverage, PAC, RNC
Exactly! Well said. McCain feigns outrage – it is so phony. We all know that if he believed he could raise more than the $84M he would opt out of public financing. What no one is reporting on is WHY isn’t McCain tapping into the fat cat republican fundraisers? They have always raised more than the democrats? Why is McCain not pusuing republican fat cats? Have they abandoned him or is he just inept?
Paulette
http://www.letustalk.wordpress.com
[...] found a way to raise money so they can sell ads to his campaign, and so it’s something of a conflict of interest for them — do they tell the truth, or do they help keep it looking like a close contest to [...]
[...] And I know that politicians will often say anything to win, so I’m not surprised that not everything coming out of the McCain campaign is true or that his message changes. That’s just politics as usual. I sure don’t expect that the media is covering either candidate accurately – they’re in it to make money, after all, they want us to keep tuning in, and that’s just business. [...]
Hi,
Your site is one of my favorites seen around blog explosion. Keep up the good work.
I enjoy reading your blog. It is great to find someone who can find the fun things in life!
I wish you all the best in all years. I look forward to developing a friendship and networking with you. Let me know if there is something I can do to assist you with your business free.
With Regards,
Karoly Domonyi
http://www.ariestrade.com
This is awesome, many thanks <3 http://starstylefile.wordpress.com/
Great post.
A lot of us forget that the media is not in business to deliver content to us. Instead, the media is in the business of delivering advertising. The “content” is just filler in between the ads.
Tobacco companies didn’t sell cigarettes. They delivered nicotine. The cigarette was just the vehicle for delivery.
Content, for the media, is just the vehicle to package and and deliver the ads to the consumer.
[...] reports describe controversies, poll results, and fund raising – they’re more interested in ratings and advertising revenues than in what they “report” on. Many of the most popular programs and sources display an [...]
[...] on the other hand, care less about confidence than they do about buzz and ratings (and ultimately ad revenues.) Their success depend on their audience, after all. Media organizations are, at the end of the [...]